Cameron Payne of the Phoenix Suns, NBA player stats

Home | Teams/Players | Commentary | Contact Us

Cameron Payne
Phoenix Suns
2021-2022 NBA Season

More Cameron Payne stats at Basketball-Reference.com

Player Stats

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
29%	+11	1.06	1.03	1.6	11	7	61.1

These stats represent how the team performed while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

Game 3.4 9.2 .376 .436 29% 4% 1.8 9.8

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 71% .376   47% 3% 4.9

Close 28% .574   7% 9% 3.0

Dunk 1% 1.000   0% 0% .1

Other 0% .000   0% 0% .0

Inside 29% .583   7% 8% 3.1

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 47% .365   27% 4% 3.2

11-15 28% .576   23% 7% 2.9

16-20 16% .462   50% 0% 1.3

21+ 9% .333   25% 7% .6

Crunch 25% .415   43% 2% 1.9

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
33	40	82.5	6.0	4.9	182	17	9.3%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
26	9	10	7	52	14	3.7	8.2	7.8

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
7	358	2.0%	26.0%	44	362	12.2%	72.9%	14.1	98.9

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
1	5		%	3%	%	6	.9	1.0%	13	.46	2.7

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
4	14	13		17.7

5-Man Units

Top Five-Man Floor Units

#	Unit	Min	Off	Def	+/-	W	L	Win%
1	Payne-Shamet-Booker-C.Johnson-McGee	40	1.09	.95	14	5	3	62
2	Payne-Shamet-Nader-C.Johnson-McGee	31	1.24	1.15	8	4	4	50
3	Payne-Shamet-Bridges-C.Johnson-McGee	31	1.32	.98	23	4	1	80
4	Payne-Shamet-Nader-C.Johnson-Kaminsky	22	.82	.81	2	2	2	50
5	Payne-Booker-Bridges-C.Johnson-Kaminsky	20	1.12	1.05	1	2	3	40
6	Payne-Booker-Crowder-Bridges-Ayton	17	1.14	1.00	4	3	2	60
7	Payne-Booker-Bridges-C.Johnson-Ayton	14	1.12	.76	11	5	1	83
8	Payne-Booker-Bridges-C.Johnson-McGee	12	1.00	.73	10	5	2	71
9	Paul-Payne-Bridges-C.Johnson-Ayton	11	.73	1.27	-17	1	2	33
10	Paul-Payne-Shamet-C.Johnson-McGee	10	1.29	1.04	3	1	1	50
11	Payne-Booker-Crowder-Bridges-McGee	9	1.35	1.44	1	2	2	50
12	Payne-Shamet-Booker-C.Johnson-Kaminsky	7	.73	1.19	-8	1	2	33
13	Payne-Nader-Bridges-C.Johnson-Kaminsky	5	.64	1.27	-7	0	2	0
14	Payne-Crowder-Bridges-C.Johnson-McGee	5	1.11	1.56	-4	0	1	0
15	Payne-Shamet-Bridges-C.Johnson-Ayton	5	1.58	1.38	1	1	1	50
16	Payne-Payton-Bridges-C.Johnson-McGee	4	.71	1.57	-6	0	2	0
17	Paul-Payne-Crowder-Bridges-Ayton	4	.75	1.75	-8	0	2	0
18	Payne-Shamet-Booker-C.Johnson-Ayton	4	.33	1.44	-11	0	2	0
19	Payne-Payton-C.Johnson-Wainright-McGee	3	1.50	.78	5	1	0	100
20	Paul-Payne-Nader-C.Johnson-McGee	3	.88	.88	0	0	0	0

Top Five-Man Floor Units, Details

# Unit eFG eFGA FTA Close dClose Reb T/O

1 Payne-Shamet-Booker-C.Johnson-McGee .420 .460 +10 25% 19%   57% +4%

2 Payne-Shamet-Nader-C.Johnson-McGee .540 .460 -6 33% 23%   57% -9%

3 Payne-Shamet-Bridges-C.Johnson-McGee .500 .400 -1 26% 25%   57% -2%

4 Payne-Shamet-Nader-C.Johnson-Kaminsky .320 .350 -3 36% 37%   51% 0%

5 Payne-Booker-Bridges-C.Johnson-Kaminsky .530 .440 +4 42% 38%   43% -3%

6 Payne-Booker-Crowder-Bridges-Ayton .480 .390 -2 24% 12%   45% +16%

7 Payne-Booker-Bridges-C.Johnson-Ayton .470 .350 -1 40% 15%   51% +14%

8 Payne-Booker-Bridges-C.Johnson-McGee .350 .270 +3 35% 32%   42% +16%

9 Paul-Payne-Bridges-C.Johnson-Ayton .330 .520 -1 13% 48%   30% -12%

10 Paul-Payne-Shamet-C.Johnson-McGee .630 .430 +2 31% 29%   46% -6%

11 Payne-Booker-Crowder-Bridges-McGee .580 .410 0 25% 18%   47% -14%

12 Payne-Shamet-Booker-C.Johnson-Kaminsky .250 .540 -2 25% 31%   38% +25%

13 Payne-Nader-Bridges-C.Johnson-Kaminsky .330 .630 -4 44% 50%   25% 0%

14 Payne-Crowder-Bridges-C.Johnson-McGee .270 .560 -1 40% 33%   68% 0%

15 Payne-Shamet-Bridges-C.Johnson-Ayton .800 .500 -6 50% 25%   75% -1%

16 Payne-Payton-Bridges-C.Johnson-McGee .250 .710 0 50% 29%   64% -14%

17 Paul-Payne-Crowder-Bridges-Ayton .380 .560 -3 25% 44%   35% -12%

18 Payne-Shamet-Booker-C.Johnson-Ayton .170 .460 -2 17% 18%   25% -5%

19 Payne-Payton-C.Johnson-Wainright-McGee .710 .140 -2 43% 14%   100% -25%

20 Paul-Payne-Nader-C.Johnson-McGee .430 .430 0 29% 29%   50% 0%

Production by Position

Player Floor Time Stats by Position

Position	Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
PG	25%	+45	111.7	103.9	7.8	12	6	66%
SG	4%	-35	83.6	118.7	-35.1	3	5	37%
SF
PF
C

Min represents the percentage of the team's total minutes the player was at that position. W and L are not adjusted in this instance by quality of opponent while at that position in a game.

Player 48-Minute Production by Position

Position	FGA	eFG%	FTA	iFG	Reb	Ast	T/O	Blk	PF	Pts	PER*
PG	24.9	.430	6.6	30%	8.0	8.7	4.2	1.0	4.5	26.8	16.4
SG	22.7	.477	2.1	18%	5.2	2.1	7.2	.0	5.2	23.7	3.5
SF
PF
C

Opponent Counterpart 48-Minute Production

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG 22.1 .500 5.9 21% 6.3 5.2 4.7 .7 3.8 26.7 14.6

SG 10.3 .550 .0 20% 7.2 4.1 3.1 .0 7.2 11.4 6.0

SF

PF

C

Net 48-Minute Production by Position

Position FGA eFG% FTA iFG Reb Ast T/O Blk PF Pts PER*

PG 2.8 -.070 .7 9% 1.7 3.5 .5 .3 -.7 .2 1.8

SG 12.4 -.073 2.1 -2% -2.1 -2.1 -4.1 .0 2.1 12.4 -2.6

SF

PF

C

Clutch Statistics

(4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left,
neither team ahead by more than 5 points)

Floor Time statistics

Min	Net Pts	Off	Def	Net48	W	L	Win%
4%	-4	116.8	272.4	%-155.7	0	1	0.0%

These stats represent how the team performed in clutch situations while the player was on the floor.
The Net48 number shows the average +/- net points over a full game.

Scoring

By FG. FGA FG% eFG% Ast'd Blk'd FTM Pts

48 Min 38.9 38.9 1.000 .000 0% 0% 38.9 38.9

Shooting Details

Shot selection

Shot Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

Jump 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Close 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Dunk 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Other 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Inside 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Shot clock usage

Secs. Att. eFG% Ast'd Blk'd Pts

0-10 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

11-15 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

16-20 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

21+ 0% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Crunch 200% .000   0% 0% 0.0

Free Throw Shooting and Foul Drawing

FTM	FTA	FT%	FTA48	PTS48	FGA	Fouled	DrawF
1	2	50.0	77.8	38.9	2	1	50.0%

FGA includes the number of shooting fouls drawn.

Passing Stats

3-Pt Assists	Jump Assists	Close Assists	Dunk Assists	Total Assists	Passing T/O's	Assist/ Bad Pass	Passing Rating	AST48
0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	%-77.8	0.0

Rebounding

Off Rebounds	Off. Reb Chances	Off. Reb Pct	Team Off Reb%	Def Rebounds	Def. Reb Chances	Def. Reb Pct	Team Def Reb%	Player Rating	Team FT Rating
0	1	0.0%	0.0%	0	0	0.0%	0.0%	0.0	0.0

Shot Blocking

Jump Blocks	Close Blocks	Dunk Blocks	Jump Pct	Close Pct	Dunk Pct	All Blocks	BLK48	Block Pct	Shoot Fouls	Blocks/ Foul	Block Rating
0	0	0	0%	0%	0%	0	0.0	0.0%	0	0.00	0.0

Turnovers and Ball Handling

Offensive Fouls	Bad Passes	Ball Handling Turnovers	Other Turnovers	'Hands' Rating
0	1	0	0	%-115.8

On Court / Off Court stats

Many stats are shown on a 'per 48 minute' basis

Stat	ON Court	OFF Court	Net
Minutes	321	759	29%
Offense: Pts per 100 Poss.	105.2	115.9	-10.7
Defense: Pts per 100 Poss.	103.6	106.6	-3.1
Net Points per 100 Possessions	+1.6	+9.2	-7.6
Points Scored	722	1844	-1122
Points Allowed	711	1706	-995
Net Points	+11	+138	-127
Effective FG%	50.3%	56.2%	-5.8%
Effective FG% Allowed	49.0%	51.1%	-2.1%
Assisted Field Goals	62%	61%	+1%
Assisted FG% Allowed	55%	57%	-2%
Own Shots Blocked	4%	3%	+1%
Shots Blocked	5%	4%	+1%
Rebounding
Offensive Rebounding	26.0%	20.3%	+5.7%
Defensive Rebounding	72.9%	73.8%	-0.9%
Total Rebounding	49.5%	47.0%	+2.4%
Stats
Free Throws Made	17	15	+2
Free Throws Attempted	22	20	+2
Free Throws Made by Opp.	18	13	-5
Free Throws Attempted by Opp.	24	17	-7
Turnovers, on Offense	17	12	-5
Turnovers, on Defense	17	15	+2
Net Turnovers	0	3	+3
Fouls Committed	22	17	-5
Fouls, Drawn	21	19	+2
Net Fouls	-1	2	+3

We want your feedback! Tell us your thoughts